who would be the right person to draft this into a formal proposal? It seems that the Osmo community has interest in matching.
I guess the person who drafts the proposal (and if it’s successful) will get one of the 10 special NFT’s 1f609
Good question, I was hoping to have more of a sense of who would do the various aspect of this work (engineering/product/ux/security) before moving forward with this proposal but maybe that isn’t necessary since it is just a bounty. If no one else picks it up soon I may take the lead on drafting the next stage of this proposal since I started the original thread, but also happy to let someone else pickup that torch!
Agreed, some important next steps are to create the feature spec and mockups as well as to create a proposal for the bounty, and I’d be happy to support these efforts. However at this moment I’m mainly focused on setting up the product workstream and organizational processes for all future feature development as well as supporting the open sourcing efforts. Planning to kick off the Product Workstream next week, and hopefully the development workstream will be up and running in the next 1-2 weeks as well, although we could still use more clarity on what this workstream will look like pre-open-sourcing.
what do you think of creating the proposal to fund this and including both the design, development, and PM expenses as part of the bounty, and then we can follow up with designs, spec, and development after the proposal has passed? We could transfer the funds for the bounty from the DAO to Colony to then be allocated to contributors in the product and development workstreams.
Hey - yea I think that is a good next step. Would be great if a leader of this bounty wanted to step up to lead this project and move this proposal forward, but I am happy to do it in the meantime.
I think for now it is best to clearly separate the bounty and proposals for the osmosis integration and the gravity integration. Also probably best to focus on the Osmosis bounty first since their community has already offered to match the bounty and showed such strong support for it.
So with that being said I would propose the following milestones for this bounty:
(1) delivery of UI/UX designs to the community for review/feedback/approval for Osmosis integration into ShapeShift Mobile and Web. This should include functionality and UX for (a) OSMO chain and asset support (b) OSMO staking/reward claiming (c) swapping on the OSMO/ATOM pair at minimum (additional pairs would be a bonus for the UX but would require additional asset support) and (d) LPing for OSMO/ATOM pool (additional pairs would be a bonus for the UX but would require additional asset support)
(2) engineering delivery of (a) and (b) from above
(3) engineering delivery of (c) and (d) from above
Each of these 3 milestones can have 1/3 of the bounty attached for the folks that pick this up.
This can look similar for the Gravity/Atom staking implementation but we can worry about that if/when the osmosis bounty is voted on by the DAO.
If anything else should be included as part of this bounty for Osmosis please provide feedback now so I can include in the boardroom ideation draft.
I’ll write this up into a draft of a formal proposal and move it forward into boardroom next.
love it, thanks for pushing this forward and looking forward to supporting this in boardroom, supporting this in the product workstream, and soon using Gravity Dex and Osmosis in ShapeShift 1f680
Hey all, I am interested in coordinating efforts on this project. I’m a current FOX and have some insight on how to best resource this project and get the ball rolling on the Osmosis integration. I am inspired at the community response on their side and see this as a great opportunity for ShapeShift.
Seems like the next steps are turning this into a formal proposal, so I’d like to take a stab at that and get any feedback in ideation on boardroom.
whooo that would be awesome - with you leading the charge I am even more confident on this getting done.
I’ll leave it up to to post the next part of this on boardroom in proposal format (and happy to be available to assist as needed) and Danielle will be an amazing leader if this proposal passes for resourcing and organizing a team to make this actually happen!
Update - has moved this proposal forward into board room ideation: Boardroom Management Portal
Looking forward to any feedback on the ideation phase
The proposal is live and ready for votes!
https://snapshot.org/#/shapeshiftdao.eth/proposal/QmNUYcSRexfesyTofk6emdSAMoRUi1PcVU4HJp7eyDvNgz
Summary - This proposal would accomplish the following: 1. Add support for OSMO chain/asset on ShapeShift native wallet and KeepKey. 2. Add support for OSMO staking and reward claiming. 3. Add support for swapping OSMO/ATOM. 4. Add support for LPing for OSMO/ATOM pool. This integration would be on both mobile and web.
I’m interested in doing the KeepKey support on this one - let’s see how the proposal goes as it’s active in Boardroom and keep in touch about the specifics of the KeepKey work specification.
Congrats on the successful passage of this proposal, and for the first one in history to achieve quorum 1f642
Hey Shapeshift DAO!
This is Josh/Dogemos from the Osmosis/Keplr team.
Looks like the Shapeshift proposal passed. Truly an honor that the Osmosis integration proposal was the first one to reach quorum.
Just want to give the Shapeshift DAO community members a heads up that there will be an open discussion on the Osmosis Shapeshift integration on Aug 10, 10PM UTC (6PM ET) on Shapeshift Discord stage.
We will have key members of Shapeshift and Osmosis join to discuss the details.
https://twitter.com/osmosiszone/status/1424782422919421972
On the other hand, the proposal on the Osmosis community pool side to add additional $OSMO bounty for this integration task is being drafted and discussed here. Currently, we’re thinking of 100,000 OSMO (roughly ~$175,000 at current market valuation) which will be used to either to increase bounties stated here, or for additional tasks that can streamline the user experience around the integration.
Please feel free to join in and let us know your opinions as well.
Awesome - look forward to the discussion tonight 1f642
I will say personally I would really like to see the OSMO added to the current bounty tasks (or at least a decent % of that amount) as that is what was originally discussed between the communities and I think its important to establish that both ShapeShift and Osmosis are funding this initial integration.
If the OSMO community wants to add some additional bounty tasks with OSMO past that I am all for that!
Love this. Huge fan of Osmosis and will vote on the Osmosis side too 1f603
So good idea to integrate Osmosis to gravity. I’m in!