SCP-198: rFOX 3.0 v3 Simple 25% rewards 5% burn

Summary

This proposal updates the rFOX program (rFOX 2.0 v2) to launch rFOX 3.0 v3: Simple 25% rewards 5% burn, keeping everything on Arbitrum. It distributes 25% of all ShapeShift DAO revenues in USDC to FOX stakers on Arbitrum, sent directly to their staking EVM addresses. It also introduces a simple, 5% burn mechanism based on monthly fees earned by the DAO.

Abstract

This proposal replaces the flat, volume-triggered burn and Thorchain-based mechanics with an all-Arbitrum design that rewards FOX stakers in USDC and simplifies FOX buyback-and-burn.

Motivation

The existing rFOX program relies on Thorchain address mapping and includes a burn of just 15% of RUNE fees that go to the treasury. This proposal removes the complexity and weak incentives by:

  • Migrating entirely to Arbitrum and EVM-native FOX staking addresses.
  • Replacing the existing 15% burn of RUNE with 5% of all Revenue.
  • Distributing 25% real revenue in the form of USDC to users who staked FOX.

This redesign offers clarity, incentives, and streamlined implementation.

Specification

  • Chain: Arbitrum only. No Thorchain address linkage or distribution.

  • Reward Distribution:

    • 25% of all ShapeShift DAO revenues are distributed monthly in USDC to FOX stakers on Arbitrum.
    • Rewards are sent directly to the EVM address used to stake FOX.
  • Change to existing Burn:

    • The current ongoing general burn is changed to be from 15% of all RUNE to 5% of all Revenue.

KPIs

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

KPI Definition Success Criteria
Monthly Trading Volume Monthly volume traded through ShapeShift Success: $100M/month; Smashing Success: ≥ $150M/month; Failure: < $50M/month for 3 consecutive months
FOX Buyback and Burn Impact on circulating FOX supply (1B total supply) Success: Decrease by ≥1% during any quarter; Failure: Decrease by <1% during all quarters
USDC Distributed to Users Monthly total USDC rewards distributed Success: ≥$40K/month; Smashing Success: ≥$80K/month; Failure: <$25K/month for 3 consecutive months
Unique rFOX Participants Number of new unique addresses receiving USDC rewards Success: ≥35 monthly; Smashing Success: ≥75 monthly; Failure: <35 monthly for consecutive quarters
Staked FOX Tokens Percentage of circulating FOX tokens staked (currently 4.7%) Success: 10%; Smashing Success: 15%; Failure: <10% sustained
Staker Retention Rate Percentage of users who continue participation MoM Success: ≥40%; Smashing Success: ≥60%; Failure: <30% for two quarters
Staker Re-staking Rate Percentage of users who stake (>10% of original stake) again within 3 months Success: ≥20%; Smashing Success: ≥40%; Failure: <10% for two quarters

Benefits

  • Simplified Infrastructure: No need to link 0x and Thorchain addresses. Arbitrum-only means lower costs, reduced friction.
  • Real Revenue to Users: USDC rewards > RUNE rewards. Tangible value to FOX stakers.
  • Simplicity Incentives: Aligns FOX burn with monthly revenue in an easy to digest way.
  • Stronger Messaging: Clean and clear: stake FOX, earn USDC, help burn FOX.
  • User Growth Potential: Revenue share across all protocols (not just Thorchain) widens appeal and strengthens reward base.

Drawbacks

  • Burn is wasteful: No evidence a buyback and burn does anything.
  • Arbitrum-Only Limitation: Non-Arbitrum users must bridge or miss out.

Vote

  • For: Adopt rFOX 3.0 v3 on Arbitrum with direct 25% USDC rewards and flat 5% FOX burn monthly.
  • Against: Maintain the current rFOX program with Thorchain addresses and fixed burn logic.
2 Likes

Thanks for positing the Final Vote, I’m still for this proposal!

Although, why isn’t it including KPIs as SCP-195 mandates?

Future proposals and ideation posts presented on features, campaigns, or programs not explicitly outlined in Workstream proposals without success metrics will not be implemented by the DAO as the governance requirements (set forth here) will not be met.
[…]
A sub-section titled KPIs should be included in this section presenting success metrics of the proposal in question. The more detail, the better

I think RFOX qualifies as a “program”, so if this Proposal passes, technically the DAO shouldn’t execute on it without these KPI specified :face_with_diagonal_mouth:

You had a set of KPIs listed during Ideation, and I remember some comment/remarks about them… maybe it’s just oversight, if so it should be corrected before people start voting.

You are right. I will update them and put them here tonight

2 Likes

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

KPI Definition Success Criteria
Monthly Trading Volume Monthly volume traded through ShapeShift Success: $100M/month; Smashing Success: ≥ $150M/month; Failure: < $50M/month for 3 consecutive months
FOX Buyback and Burn Impact on circulating FOX supply (1B total supply) Success: Decrease by ≥1% during any quarter; Failure: Decrease by <1% during all quarters
USDC Distributed to Users Monthly total USDC rewards distributed Success: ≥$40K/month; Smashing Success: ≥$80K/month; Failure: <$25K/month for 3 consecutive months
Unique rFOX Participants Number of new unique addresses receiving USDC rewards Success: ≥35 monthly; Smashing Success: ≥75 monthly; Failure: <35 monthly for consecutive quarters
Staked FOX Tokens Percentage of circulating FOX tokens staked (currently 4.7%) Success: 10%; Smashing Success: 15%; Failure: <10% sustained
Staker Retention Rate Percentage of users who continue participation MoM Success: ≥40%; Smashing Success: ≥60%; Failure: <30% for two quarters
Staker Re-staking Rate Percentage of users who stake (>10% of original stake) again within 3 months Success: ≥20%; Smashing Success: ≥40%; Failure: <10% for two quarters
1 Like

Simplicity wins the day. One thing I’m curious about is the timeline for current stakers, we’ll have to upgrade the rFOX contract which will take some amount of time. So we’d have to align on the switchover of reward types.

The cool thing about this, is that they don’t have to do anything when the contract upgrades to accept and distribute USDC pro-rata. Shout out EVM tooling. If you’re staked you just chill and vest basically.

These thoughts are assuming this passes of course*

1 Like