Proposal to create an “Alpha” version of the open-source ShapeShift web app with analytics


This is a proposal to create an “Alpha” version of the open-source ShapeShift web app.

The Alpha version will be an “opt-in” first look experimental version of ShapeShift where features will be launched in their infancy for testing and feedback from the community. This version will have analytics and guided user journeys, A/B testing, heatmaps and more (via Pendo), so that the product team can discover pain points, validate assumptions, and gather feedback to improve the experience, before releasing changes to the Private version. This will be a truly opt-in Alpha version, that users will agree to participate in upon entering. No PII data will ever be tracked, in fact, part of the agreement with Pendo is that we are not allowed to track any PII, and if we do they can terminate our account.

The Private version will have no analytics or user tracking of any sort and will contain features that have already been tested and analyzed in the Alpha version.


After a lot of feedback from the community about Analytics in the DAO, a new idea was born. As the Product Workstream, our goal is to make the best user experience possible and create the best products for the success of the DAO! As part of our process we rely on analytics & data to track feature adoption, inform new features or feature updates through data-driven decisions, understand areas of product friction and ensure tight product-market fit. The data helps us answer questions like where are our users navigating? What are/aren’t they adopting? Are the users starting a journey and then abandoning at a specific point? What are the points of friction? Does the user have a clear path if something goes wrong?

And more. Therefore, we think that this early, first look Alpha version is critical to our success.

We also feel that by having two versions that are clearly labeled for the users, and the Alpha version being a true “opt-in” experience, there would be no confusion at the user level as to the differences between them.

In centralized ShapeShift, we used a combination of analytical tools to track user data, create user segments, monitor funnels and more. In the DAO, it would save us costs and effort to implement one all-powerful tool like Pendo in the Alpha version. This also makes it more useful for our DAO structure (any team will be able to grab/review data without dependencies on another team). Furthermore, Pendo will give us the ability to create user onboarding journeys, guided feature walk-thrus, a comprehensive user resource section, A/B testing, heatmaps and more—all without any engineering lift.


Alpha & Private Versions

The Alpha version will simply be a step in the CI/CD pipeline, almost like a staging environment. Once features have been launched, tested, updated and bugs eliminated, it will be pushed to the Private version.


To install Pendo, it’s a snippet of code added to the website.


The user guides, resource center and tooltip walk-thrus will be created and maintained by the Product Workstream. We also will save considerable development/engineering time, as we won’t be dependent on engineers to develop, update, or analyze these.

Reviewing Data

Analytics will be easily accessible by all workstreams in the DAO, and as a Product Workstream, we’ll share progress and review analytics with the community.


Pendo is an all-in-one tool that will save us money as we won’t have to implement multiple tools to give us the same benefits. The annual cost for integrating it into the Alpha web app is

$36,520.00 annually + $3,400 QuickStart (this will help us get up and running with the guides quickly) and will be paid to Pendo in FOX Tokens!


The Alpha version will give us the analytics and user input we need to make the product awesome before pushing it to the Private version.

By using Pendo, we’ll have an all-in-one platform for tracking, analyzing, and creating guided user journeys (instead of paying for multiple platforms). We expect the initial setup to take several weeks to get all the guides and the resource center up and running. As mentioned above, all of that will be handled as part of the Product Workstream responsibilities. It will not require engineering efforts.

Retention is an important metric, and one that can be improved by utilizing this approach. We’ll be able to take our user experience to the next level, guiding and engaging our users at the right moments, leading to better feature engagement and higher user retention. Without the metrics we would have an extremely difficult time determining where to improve the UX and measuring the success of our product. New feature adoption rates will also be evaluated as a metric to measure success.


Pendo is not the cheapest solution out there. But, it’s an all-inclusive solution where we feel the benefits outweigh the cost (especially if compared to pricing out several different tools that collectively would provide the same benefits). We’d also be committing to an annual plan to get the best pricing.


If you vote “for” this proposal you are voting to create an ALPHA and PRIVATE version of the new ShapeShift web app. Alpha will contain analytics tool Pendo

If you vote “against” this proposal, you do not think this is the correct approach for the DAO or that you think there might be a better solution

I love this and can’t wait to use ShapeShift Alpha. I think this is a terrific creative solution to the Security Workstream’s push back against including any analytics in ShapeShift’s opensource apps. killer name too 1f642

Love this solution, would love to see it move forward!

Great proposal. So impressed that the disagreements In the previous proposal lead to this alpha idea. Great idea and I’m looking forward to using alpha myself!

I really like this as solution and am in support of this!

I like this solution, but am curious what your estimate is for the user base for the Alpha Analytics app. I can see some confusion could be born out of both running and having pw snafus and funds being lost if customers get confused around which one to use. Will there be a big distinction in branding and look?

im absolutely in support of this solution, and will happily use ShapeShift Alpha to contribute to product improvement!

thank you!

We did the analytics pricing for up to 50K MAUs. We feel that from an analytics perspective we don’t need more than that to get the data we need to make informed decisions. There will be two distinct URLS between the Alpha and Private versions, and the user will need to OPT IN upon entering APLHA. There will be no accounts or passwords in the new web app, users will just connect their wallets.

ok awesome. We’ll just want to keep our fingers on the pulse on the support side of things. I could see how confusion might happen no matter how clear we are. I’m excited about this and am all for gathering as much intel as we can.